Attend any traditional wedding ceremony and I guarantee you'll hear the pastor explain the symbolism behind the exchange of rings. The moral is that the ring, (similar in fashion to the concept of love) has neither a beginning nor an ending. Continue to listen and you will also hear the pastor elaborate on how love has the ability to endure all things and manifest itself in an unconditional nature. Now spend an afternoon in your local Barnes and Nobles researching modern day divorce rates and you'll learn that the U.S. ranks #1 in divorce rates with nearly five out of every 1,000 people falling into the divorcee category. It seems almost as commonplace today for couples to divorce as it is for them to marry. Just fifty years ago, our grandparents were able to maintain life long marriages. What did they know that we don't? Think about it… similar traditions, similar vows, similar churches; different results. Does this suggest that our ancestors were better at remaining in love than we are? Is the modern day church more accepting of the ideas of separation and/or divorce? Are we more inclined to lean on our own understanding and therefore disregard the teachings of the church as it applies to marriage? Or maybe, just maybe... it requires more than love to sustain a marriage. Is love sufficient? What is your take on the subject?
Corey R.